Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | FP Markets★ Our Pick | IG Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Regulation | ASIC (Australia) | FCA (UK) |
| Reg. Tier | Tier-1 Regulated | Tier-1 Regulated |
| Min Deposit | $100 AUD (~$65 USD) | $250 AUD / £250 (no minimum for some regions) |
| EUR/USD Spread | 0.0 pips avg (Raw ECN) | 0.6 pips (standard, no commission) |
| Commission | $6/lot round turn | $0 (spread-only on standard) / commission on share CFDs |
| Max Leverage | Up to 1:500 | Up to 1:400 (non-EU) / 1:30 (EU/UK retail) |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, Iress | IG Trading Platform (proprietary), MetaTrader 4, ProRealTime, L2 Dealer |
| Founded | 2005 | 1974 |
| Our Rating | 4.6/5 | 4.5/5 |
Data accurate as of Q1 2026. Verify current terms with each broker directly.
Key Differences
Why FP Markets wins
Where IG Markets is stronger
Regulation & Safety
Winner: FP MarketsFP Markets is regulated by ASIC (Australia), CySEC (Cyprus), FSCA (South Africa), FSA (Seychelles), FSC (Mauritius). This places it in the Tier-1 Regulated category — the highest standard of retail investor protection, with mandatory client fund segregation, negative balance protection, and access to compensation schemes where applicable.
IG Markets holds licences from FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), BaFin (Germany), MAS (Singapore), FSCA (South Africa), DFSA (UAE), making it Tier-1 Regulated. With 6 Tier-1 regulators, IG Markets meets the highest standards of retail broker oversight.
Both brokers operate under comparable Tier-1 Regulated frameworks — a tie on regulatory safety. The practical difference comes down to jurisdiction: choose the entity that operates under your country's local regulator for maximum protection.
Trading Costs — The Real Numbers
Winner: FP MarketsTrading costs are where many brokers win or lose active traders. On a standard EUR/USD 1-lot trade ($100,000 notional), the all-in cost breaks down as follows: FP Markets charges a spread of 0.0 pips avg (Raw ECN) (approximately $0) plus $6/lot round turn commission — totalling roughly $6 per lot round turn.
IG Markets runs 0.6 pips (standard, no commission) spread with $0 (spread-only on standard) / commission on share CFDs — an all-in cost of approximately $6 per lot. Over 100 lots per month, the difference adds up to roughly $0 in favour of FP Markets.
FP Markets wins on trading costs. FP Markets's 0.0 pips avg (Raw ECN) structure and $6/lot round turn make it the more cost-efficient choice for active traders — particularly those trading multiple lots daily. IG Markets's pricing suits traders who value predictability over rock-bottom spreads.
Platforms & Tools
Winner: FP MarketsFP Markets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, Iress. This multi-platform approach gives traders genuine flexibility — from algorithmic trading on MT5 to discretionary charting on TradingView.
IG Markets offers IG Trading Platform (proprietary), MetaTrader 4, ProRealTime, L2 Dealer. Its proprietary platform is purpose-built for its instrument range and is often more intuitive for clients new to CFD trading.
For beginners: IG Markets wins — its platform is more approachable. For active traders: FP Markets has the edge with TradingView integration and advanced charting. For algo traders: FP Markets is better placed, offering cTrader's native algo environment alongside MT5. Overall platform winner: FP Markets (5 platforms vs 4).
Execution Quality
Winner: FP MarketsExecution model matters for scalpers, news traders, and anyone trading large size. FP Markets operates as a ECN (Electronic Communications Network) broker — routing orders directly to liquidity providers with no dealing desk intervention, which means tighter spreads during normal conditions and no re-quotes.
IG Markets runs a Market Maker / spread-only model. The spread-only model means all costs are baked in, making it straightforward to calculate trade profitability without tracking per-lot commission. On speed and slippage: IG Markets reports execution in sub-50ms for standard orders, with no restrictions on scalping or EA use.
Execution winner: FP Markets — scoring 9/10 versus IG Markets's 8/10. FP Markets's ECN (Electronic Communications Network) model is better suited to active traders. IG Markets's execution remains adequate for retail strategies but is not optimised for professional-level frequency or volume.
Minimum Deposit & Account Opening
Winner: FP MarketsGetting started matters. FP Markets requires a minimum deposit of $100 AUD (~$65 USD). The $100 AUD (~$65 USD) minimum is moderate — accessible to most retail traders but a meaningful commitment for beginners.
IG Markets starts at $250 AUD / £250 (no minimum for some regions). The $250 AUD / £250 (no minimum for some regions) threshold is on the higher side — worth noting for traders with limited starting capital. Account opening is typically completed online in under 24 hours for both brokers.
On accessibility: FP Markets wins — $100 AUD (~$65 USD) to start vs $250 AUD / £250 (no minimum for some regions). If capital efficiency matters, FP Markets lets you begin trading with less at risk.
Who Should Choose Which?
★ Choose FP Markets if...
Choose IG Markets if...
Our Verdict
FP Markets wins this comparison
FP Markets wins this comparison with a 4.6/5 rating against IG Markets's 4.5/5. Cost-conscious active traders who want the cheapest ASIC-regulated ECN broker with maximum instrument range. IG Markets remains a strong choice for experienced traders who want the widest instrument range and fca-regulated safety, particularly for uk/eu clients. Neither is a bad broker — the right pick comes down to your specific priorities.
Read full reviews
Compare more brokers
Open Your NextTrade Account in 3 Minutes
Raw ECN spreads from 0.0 pips. $50 minimum deposit. MT5 platform. No dealing desk.
You'll be redirected to dashboard.nexttrade.com · Affiliate link · CFD trading involves risk