NextTradeBroker
NextTrade Affiliate Partner
Visit NextTrade
Home/Reviews/FP Markets vs OANDA

FP Markets vs OANDA: Which Is Better in 2026?

We tested both. Here's the honest verdict.

Regulation:OANDA
Costs:FP Markets
Execution:FP Markets
Platforms:FP Markets
Support:FP Markets
Education:OANDA
Overall Pick:FP Markets4.6/5

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureFP Markets★ Our PickOANDA
RegulationASIC (Australia)NFA/CFTC (USA)
Reg. TierTier-1 RegulatedTier-1 Regulated
Min Deposit$100 AUD (~$65 USD)$0
EUR/USD Spread0.0 pips avg (Raw ECN)From 0.7 pips (standard, no commission)
Commission$6/lot round turn$0 (standard) / commission-based (Core, $10k min)
Max LeverageUp to 1:500Up to 1:50 (US) / 1:200 (non-US)
PlatformsMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, IressMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, OANDA Trade
Founded20051996
Our Rating4.6/54.1/5

Data accurate as of Q1 2026. Verify current terms with each broker directly.

Key Differences

Why FP Markets wins

More platforms (5 vs 4)
Higher overall rating (4.6/5 vs 4.1/5)

Where OANDA is stronger

Lower entry ($0 minimum)
One of the only major brokers accepting US retail forex traders

Regulation & Safety

Winner: FP Markets

FP Markets is regulated by ASIC (Australia), CySEC (Cyprus), FSCA (South Africa), FSA (Seychelles), FSC (Mauritius). This places it in the Tier-1 Regulated category — the highest standard of retail investor protection, with mandatory client fund segregation, negative balance protection, and access to compensation schemes where applicable.

OANDA holds licences from NFA/CFTC (USA), FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), MAS (Singapore), JFSA (Japan), CIRO (Canada), making it Tier-1 Regulated. With 6 Tier-1 regulators, OANDA meets the highest standards of retail broker oversight.

Both brokers operate under comparable Tier-1 Regulated frameworks — a tie on regulatory safety. The practical difference comes down to jurisdiction: choose the entity that operates under your country's local regulator for maximum protection.

Trading Costs — The Real Numbers

Winner: FP Markets

Trading costs are where many brokers win or lose active traders. On a standard EUR/USD 1-lot trade ($100,000 notional), the all-in cost breaks down as follows: FP Markets charges a spread of 0.0 pips avg (Raw ECN) (approximately $0) plus $6/lot round turn commission — totalling roughly $6 per lot round turn.

OANDA runs From 0.7 pips (standard, no commission) spread with $0 (standard) / commission-based (Core, $10k min) — an all-in cost of approximately $7 per lot. Over 100 lots per month, the difference adds up to roughly $100 in favour of FP Markets.

FP Markets wins on trading costs. FP Markets's 0.0 pips avg (Raw ECN) structure and $6/lot round turn make it the more cost-efficient choice for active traders — particularly those trading multiple lots daily. OANDA's pricing suits traders who value predictability over rock-bottom spreads.

FP MarketsOANDA
EUR/USD Spread0.0 pips avg (Raw ECN)From 0.7 pips (standard, no commission)
Commission$6/lot round turn$0 (standard) / commission-based (Core, $10k min)
Est. cost/lot~$6~$7
Monthly (100 lots)~$600~$700

Platforms & Tools

Winner: FP Markets

FP Markets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, Iress. This multi-platform approach gives traders genuine flexibility — from algorithmic trading on MT5 to discretionary charting on TradingView.

OANDA offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, OANDA Trade. Its proprietary platform is purpose-built for its instrument range and is often more intuitive for clients new to CFD trading.

For beginners: OANDA wins — its platform is more approachable. For active traders: FP Markets has the edge with TradingView integration and advanced charting. For algo traders: FP Markets is better placed, offering cTrader's native algo environment alongside MT5. Overall platform winner: FP Markets (5 platforms vs 4).

Execution Quality

Winner: FP Markets

Execution model matters for scalpers, news traders, and anyone trading large size. FP Markets operates as a ECN (Electronic Communications Network) broker — routing orders directly to liquidity providers with no dealing desk intervention, which means tighter spreads during normal conditions and no re-quotes.

OANDA runs a Market Maker / spread-only model. The spread-only model means all costs are baked in, making it straightforward to calculate trade profitability without tracking per-lot commission. On speed and slippage: OANDA reports execution in sub-50ms for standard orders, with no restrictions on scalping or EA use.

Execution winner: FP Markets — scoring 9/10 versus OANDA's 7/10. FP Markets's ECN (Electronic Communications Network) model is better suited to active traders. OANDA's execution remains adequate for retail strategies but is not optimised for professional-level frequency or volume.

Minimum Deposit & Account Opening

Winner: OANDA

Getting started matters. FP Markets requires a minimum deposit of $100 AUD (~$65 USD). The $100 AUD (~$65 USD) minimum is moderate — accessible to most retail traders but a meaningful commitment for beginners.

OANDA starts at $0. No minimum deposit is a genuinely rare feature — it means you can open an account and trade from dollar one. Account opening is typically completed online in under 24 hours for both brokers.

On accessibility: OANDA wins — $0 to start vs $100 AUD (~$65 USD). If capital efficiency matters, OANDA lets you begin trading with less at risk.

Who Should Choose Which?

Choose FP Markets if...

$6/lot commission — cheapest all-in ECN cost among ASIC brokers
10,000+ instruments — widest range of any ECN broker
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView and Iress in one broker

Choose OANDA if...

One of the only major brokers accepting US retail forex traders
6 Tier-1 regulatory licences — most regulated broker in the list
No minimum deposit — genuinely zero

Our Verdict

FP Markets wins this comparison

FP Markets wins this comparison with a 4.6/5 rating against OANDA's 4.1/5. Cost-conscious active traders who want the cheapest ASIC-regulated ECN broker with maximum instrument range. OANDA remains a strong choice for us-based traders and those who prioritise maximum regulatory safety above all else. Neither is a bad broker — the right pick comes down to your specific priorities.

Read full reviews

FP Markets Full Review →OANDA Full Review →All Broker Reviews

Compare more brokers

NextTrade vs FP MarketsNextTrade vs OANDA
Start Trading Today

Open Your NextTrade Account in 3 Minutes

Raw ECN spreads from 0.0 pips. $50 minimum deposit. MT5 platform. No dealing desk.

$50 Min Deposit0.0 pip Spreads1:1000 Leverage
Open Account — It's Free

You'll be redirected to dashboard.nexttrade.com · Affiliate link · CFD trading involves risk

General Risk Notice: Trading financial instruments carries risk and may not be suitable for all individuals. The information on this site is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. nexttradebroker.com is not a licensed financial adviser and accepts no liability for decisions made based on this content.