Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Pepperstone★ Our Pick | Exness |
|---|---|---|
| Regulation | ASIC (Australia) | CySEC (Cyprus) |
| Reg. Tier | Tier-1 Regulated | Tier-2 Regulated |
| Min Deposit | $0 (recommended $200) | $10 |
| EUR/USD Spread | 0.17 pips avg (Razor ECN) | From 0.0 pips (Raw Spread account) |
| Commission | $7/lot round turn | $7/lot round turn |
| Max Leverage | Up to 1:500 | Up to 1:2000 |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, Exness Terminal, Exness Trade App |
| Founded | 2010 | 2008 |
| Our Rating | 4.7/5 | 4.3/5 |
Data accurate as of Q1 2026. Verify current terms with each broker directly.
Key Differences
Why Pepperstone wins
Where Exness is stronger
Regulation & Safety
Winner: PepperstonePepperstone is regulated by ASIC (Australia), FCA (UK), CySEC (Cyprus), BaFin (Germany), DFSA (UAE), CMA (Kenya). This places it in the Tier-1 Regulated category — the highest standard of retail investor protection, with mandatory client fund segregation, negative balance protection, and access to compensation schemes where applicable.
Exness holds licences from CySEC (Cyprus), FCA (UK), FSCA (South Africa), FSA (Seychelles), CMA (Kenya), making it Tier-2 Regulated. Exness's regulatory structure offers solid protection, though without the full compensation scheme coverage of Tier-1 licences.
On regulation, Pepperstone wins clearly. Is Pepperstone safe? Yes — its Tier-1 Regulated status means client funds are held in segregated accounts, and traders have access to formal dispute resolution. Exness's Tier-2 Regulated framework is still legitimate, but affords less formal protection.
Trading Costs — The Real Numbers
Winner: ExnessTrading costs are where many brokers win or lose active traders. On a standard EUR/USD 1-lot trade ($100,000 notional), the all-in cost breaks down as follows: Pepperstone charges a spread of 0.17 pips avg (Razor ECN) (approximately $2) plus $7/lot round turn commission — totalling roughly $9 per lot round turn.
Exness runs From 0.0 pips (Raw Spread account) spread with $7/lot round turn — an all-in cost of approximately $7 per lot. Over 100 lots per month, the difference adds up to roughly $170 in favour of Exness.
Exness wins on trading costs. Exness's From 0.0 pips (Raw Spread account) structure and $7/lot round turn make it the more cost-efficient choice for active traders — particularly those trading multiple lots daily. Pepperstone's pricing suits traders who value predictability over rock-bottom spreads.
Platforms & Tools
Winner: PepperstonePepperstone supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView. This multi-platform approach gives traders genuine flexibility — from algorithmic trading on MT5 to discretionary charting on TradingView.
Exness offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, Exness Terminal, Exness Trade App. Its proprietary platform is purpose-built for its instrument range and is often more intuitive for clients new to CFD trading.
For beginners: Exness wins — its platform is more approachable. For active traders: Pepperstone has the edge with TradingView integration and advanced charting. For algo traders: Pepperstone is better placed, offering cTrader's native algo environment alongside MT5. Overall platform winner: Pepperstone (4 platforms vs 4).
Execution Quality
Winner: PepperstoneExecution model matters for scalpers, news traders, and anyone trading large size. Pepperstone operates as a ECN (Electronic Communications Network) broker — routing orders directly to liquidity providers with no dealing desk intervention, which means tighter spreads during normal conditions and no re-quotes.
Exness runs a ECN (Electronic Communications Network) model. With $7/lot round turn per lot and From 0.0 pips (Raw Spread account) spreads, Exness passes raw interbank pricing to clients — ideal for high-frequency and algorithmic strategies. On speed and slippage: Exness reports execution in sub-50ms for standard orders, with no restrictions on scalping or EA use.
Execution winner: Pepperstone — scoring 9/10 versus Exness's 9/10. Pepperstone's ECN (Electronic Communications Network) model is better suited to active traders. Exness's execution remains adequate for retail strategies but is not optimised for professional-level frequency or volume.
Minimum Deposit & Account Opening
Winner: ExnessGetting started matters. Pepperstone requires a minimum deposit of $0 (recommended $200). The $0 (recommended $200) minimum is moderate — accessible to most retail traders but a meaningful commitment for beginners.
Exness starts at $10. $10 is a low barrier, making Exness accessible to traders building up from smaller bankrolls. Account opening is typically completed online in under 24 hours for both brokers.
On accessibility: Exness wins — $10 to start vs $0 (recommended $200). If capital efficiency matters, Exness lets you begin trading with less at risk.
Who Should Choose Which?
★ Choose Pepperstone if...
Choose Exness if...
Our Verdict
Pepperstone wins this comparison
Pepperstone wins this comparison with a 4.7/5 rating against Exness's 4.3/5. Traders who want maximum regulatory protection combined with professional ECN pricing. Exness remains a strong choice for traders in asia, africa, mena or latin america who prioritise instant withdrawals and ultra-tight spreads over tier-1 regulation. Neither is a bad broker — the right pick comes down to your specific priorities.
Read full reviews
Compare more brokers
Open Your NextTrade Account in 3 Minutes
Raw ECN spreads from 0.0 pips. $50 minimum deposit. MT5 platform. No dealing desk.
You'll be redirected to dashboard.nexttrade.com · Affiliate link · CFD trading involves risk