Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | XM Group | FP Markets★ Our Pick |
|---|---|---|
| Regulation | CySEC (Cyprus) | ASIC (Australia) |
| Reg. Tier | Tier-1 Regulated | Tier-1 Regulated |
| Min Deposit | $5 | $100 AUD (~$65 USD) |
| EUR/USD Spread | From 0.0 pips (Zero account) | 0.0 pips avg (Raw ECN) |
| Commission | $7/lot round turn (Zero account) | $6/lot round turn |
| Max Leverage | Up to 1:1000 (offshore entity) | Up to 1:500 |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, Iress |
| Founded | 2009 | 2005 |
| Our Rating | 4.2/5 | 4.6/5 |
Data accurate as of Q1 2026. Verify current terms with each broker directly.
Key Differences
Why FP Markets wins
Where XM Group is stronger
Regulation & Safety
Winner: XM GroupXM Group is regulated by CySEC (Cyprus), ASIC (Australia), FSCA (South Africa), FSC (Belize). This places it in the Tier-1 Regulated category — the highest standard of retail investor protection, with mandatory client fund segregation, negative balance protection, and access to compensation schemes where applicable.
FP Markets holds licences from ASIC (Australia), CySEC (Cyprus), FSCA (South Africa), FSA (Seychelles), FSC (Mauritius), making it Tier-1 Regulated. With 5 Tier-1 regulators, FP Markets meets the highest standards of retail broker oversight.
Both brokers operate under comparable Tier-1 Regulated frameworks — a tie on regulatory safety. The practical difference comes down to jurisdiction: choose the entity that operates under your country's local regulator for maximum protection.
Trading Costs — The Real Numbers
Winner: FP MarketsTrading costs are where many brokers win or lose active traders. On a standard EUR/USD 1-lot trade ($100,000 notional), the all-in cost breaks down as follows: XM Group charges a spread of From 0.0 pips (Zero account) (approximately $0) plus $7/lot round turn (Zero account) commission — totalling roughly $7 per lot round turn.
FP Markets runs 0.0 pips avg (Raw ECN) spread with $6/lot round turn — an all-in cost of approximately $6 per lot. Over 100 lots per month, the difference adds up to roughly $100 in favour of FP Markets.
FP Markets wins on trading costs. FP Markets's 0.0 pips avg (Raw ECN) structure and $6/lot round turn make it the more cost-efficient choice for active traders — particularly those trading multiple lots daily. XM Group's pricing suits traders who value predictability over rock-bottom spreads.
Platforms & Tools
Winner: FP MarketsXM Group supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5. This multi-platform approach gives traders genuine flexibility — from algorithmic trading on MT5 to discretionary charting on MetaTrader 4.
FP Markets offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, Iress. The combination of MetaTrader and TradingView covers virtually every trading style.
For beginners: FP Markets wins — its platform is more approachable. For active traders: FP Markets has the edge with TradingView integration and advanced charting. For algo traders: FP Markets is better placed, offering cTrader's native algo environment alongside MT5. Overall platform winner: FP Markets (5 platforms vs 2).
Execution Quality
Winner: FP MarketsExecution model matters for scalpers, news traders, and anyone trading large size. XM Group operates as a ECN (Electronic Communications Network) broker — routing orders directly to liquidity providers with no dealing desk intervention, which means tighter spreads during normal conditions and no re-quotes.
FP Markets runs a ECN (Electronic Communications Network) model. With $6/lot round turn per lot and 0.0 pips avg (Raw ECN) spreads, FP Markets passes raw interbank pricing to clients — ideal for high-frequency and algorithmic strategies. On speed and slippage: FP Markets reports execution in sub-50ms for standard orders, with no restrictions on scalping or EA use.
Execution winner: FP Markets — scoring 9/10 versus XM Group's 7/10. FP Markets's ECN (Electronic Communications Network) model is better suited to active traders. XM Group's execution remains adequate for retail strategies but is not optimised for professional-level frequency or volume.
Minimum Deposit & Account Opening
Winner: XM GroupGetting started matters. XM Group requires a minimum deposit of $5. At $5, XM Group has one of the lowest barriers to entry in the industry.
FP Markets starts at $100 AUD (~$65 USD). The $100 AUD (~$65 USD) threshold is on the higher side — worth noting for traders with limited starting capital. Account opening is typically completed online in under 24 hours for both brokers.
On accessibility: XM Group wins — $5 to start vs $100 AUD (~$65 USD). If capital efficiency matters, XM Group lets you begin trading with less at risk.
Who Should Choose Which?
★ Choose FP Markets if...
Choose XM Group if...
Our Verdict
FP Markets wins this comparison
FP Markets wins this comparison with a 4.6/5 rating against XM Group's 4.2/5. Cost-conscious active traders who want the cheapest ASIC-regulated ECN broker with maximum instrument range. XM Group remains a strong choice for beginners and emerging market traders who want a low entry point with a globally recognised brand. Neither is a bad broker — the right pick comes down to your specific priorities.
Read full reviews
Compare more brokers
Open Your NextTrade Account in 3 Minutes
Raw ECN spreads from 0.0 pips. $50 minimum deposit. MT5 platform. No dealing desk.
You'll be redirected to dashboard.nexttrade.com · Affiliate link · CFD trading involves risk